The Native American

Reading portions of the book of Ezekiel, Chapter 27:

And say to Tyre , 0 you who dwell at entrance to the sea, who are merchants of the peoples of many islands and coastlands. . . The inhabitants of Sion and [the island] of Arvad were your oarsmen; your skilled wise men, O Tyre , were in you, they were your pilots. The old men of Gebal [a city north of Sidon ] and its skilled and wise men in you were your calkers; all the ships of the sea with their mariners were in you to deal in your merchandise and trading... Your rowers brought you out into the great and deep waters; the east wind has broken and wrecked you in the heart of the seas . . . When your wares came forth from the seas, you met the desire, and the demand, and the necessity of many people; you enriched the KINGS OF THE EARTH with your abundant wealth and merchandise. Now you are shattered by the seas... (the Amplified Bible)

As I read the work of frustrated archaeologists and anthropologists, I feel an affinity with them. There is in place a barrier that prevents them from publishing findings which challenge prevailing thought. Firmly-entrenched preconceptions prohibit investigation into that which would challenge the academics.

It's time to state the truth about the so-called "Native Americans". There is no cohesive race of indigenous people called "Native Americans." They differ considerably racially and linguistically. A simple cursory examination of the various tribes scattered throughout this land reveals that their origins vary widely from West to East. Instead of concluding that these tribes were here first, we should be asking the question: where did these people come from? Being so dissimilar, they clearly could not have emerged as a single people from a single origin.

The claim that the peoples who were encountered here by 15 th century Europeans are indigenous to this land is not plausible.

However, there were another people of a single race found to be in this land thousands of years ago. Evidence of their pagan and Hebrew faiths are found all over this land and are beyond serious dispute. The problem is not the lack evidence; the problem is our willingness to embrace what is demonstrably true.

Attempts made by academia to squelch investigation into these facts are evident; in dismissing open discussion we hear words like "unscientific" and "implausible". After all, what is "scientific" or "implausible" is now determined by academia themselves. The Scientific Method is often discarded in favor of the availability of funding and current opinion – not by a passion for truth.

In a period during the late 19 th and early 20 th centuries, many books were published by passionate scientists concerning the origins of civilization and distributions of peoples. There was a surge of archaeological and anthropological activity at this time. Since then, something happened. Perhaps it was Eugenics and the events of WW2 which led to the narrowing of allowable thought. Perhaps it was centralized control over funding or economics. Whatever caused this, it happened at the same time in which we find the emergence of a mandate to minimize the influence of the White man, while simultaneously elevating the non-White peoples. In our schools, universities, corporate training programs and even from our pulpits we now also hear a new idea: we are really all the same, and trace our origin to a single man. Indeed, the words that we used to describe the non-White peoples of the world are still constantly changing in what appears to be a search for new, acceptable racial norm in Western culture.

I believe it is this search for a new, acceptable racial norm that drives the current mainline idea that the "American Indian" is indigenous to this land, and thus should be afforded special rights or recognition.

There are indeed myths pertaining to these "Indian" tribes that need to be dispelled. European man was not first introduced to corn by the Indians in the 15 th century. Neither were they first introduced to tobacco by the Indians – in fact, traces of nicotine have been found in Egyptian mummies. But the myth I want to address now is the persistent myth that they were the first peoples on the continent. Who were, then, the first "Native Americans?"

Nobody seriously refutes the fact that Viking explorers settled in Newfoundland nearly 500 years before Columbus . Why we teach our children, then, that America was discovered by Columbus in 1492 is a mystery. It is a statement of fact that the Semitic peoples of medieval Europe traveled to this continent. They were preceded by the Phoenicians in their amazing long boats centuries before Christ!

Incidentally, Indian tribal lore is full of stories concerning the original inhabitants of this land. The Oklahoma Indian tribes, for instance, speak of a bearded man called the "Healer" who claimed to come from across the great water. He chose 12 from among the natives as disciples. He told them He was born of a virgin, on a night where a bright star shone.

Throughout the western 2/3 of North America , the remains of inhabitants having no resemblance to "Indians" have been found – instead, they all have European or Aryan features. Among them are the well-known Kennewick man (Washington), the Anzik burial remains ( Montana ), the Pelican Rapids woman ( North Dakota ), a number of remains in Nebraska and the Buhl woman in Idaho . Many of these remains have been found to have been reburied by modern Indians, who are characterized by epicanthic eye folds, black hair and darker skin.

In the case of the Kennewick man, almost immediately after his remains were found in 1996, local modern tribes attempted to block any attempt to study the remains after it was revealed he was not racially connected with them. Scientists had to sue in order to gain a chance to study the remains of the Kennewick man. Quoting from a 2004 publication from the National Park Service:

Some commentators and reporters have described the legal controversy swirling around the Kennewick remains in rather super-heated rhetoric pitting the interests of "science" against those of traditional Native Americans. ( http://www.nps.gov/history/aad/Kennewick/ )

According to scientists from the U.C. Davis Molecular Anthropology Laboratory, "the remains exhibited "caucasoid-like" morphometric traits" and dates to approximately 7000 BC. According to a Associated Press release of February 24, 2006 , a federal court determined there was no link between the skeleton and the local tribes.

Eastern tribes like the Cherokees and Lubrees inarguably have Ayran characteristics; recessive traits blue eyes and light hair are often found among them. They have dolichocephalic [long-faced] cranial structures – a hallmark of Adamic man. These traits did not emerge from nowhere.

In Newpoint , Rhode Island , a 14 th century tower there was first noted by an Italian navigator in 1524. In Westford , Massachusetts , a rock engraving was found of a knight having a shield bearing the image of a ship and a single star. The history of the Knights Templar does, indeed, include narratives concerning this rich land. After the Battle of Bannockburn, they retreated with a fleet of 12 ships and 300 men to the New World .

Roman coins from its later period have been found in Missouri , Arkansas , Ohio , Indiana , Oklahoma and other states have been found and verified as authentic. In North Carolina , one Roman coin from the reign of Gallenius was found, which was minted in Egypt .

Another artifact found in a cave, called the " Rio Grande " tablet, bears an amazing testimony:

Written in a style current in the Roman colony of Libya around 300AD, the tablet proffers a poignant insight into the past. Inscribed on it is a prayer to the Roman deity Mithras, dated the 6th year of an unnamed Emperor's reign, a prayer that asks for aid and relief for a sick and lost party. Whether deserters or early explorers some researchers have concluded that the Rio Grande Tablet is the work of a lost Libyan detail of the Mithras worshipping Roman army.
( The Hidden History of the Promised Land , Rixon Stewart)

The implication of this find is clear: North Africans were on this continent 1000 years prior to Columbus !

In southern Illinois , thousands of stones were discovered in an underground chamber. Quoting Rixon Stewart again:

Numbering more than seven thousand the artifacts largely consist of stones inscribed with the portraits of ancient Egyptians, Carthaginians, Romans and Hebrews; many of which were inscribed with script resembling Phoenician or ancient Semitic writing.
(The Hidden History of the Promised Land, Rixon Stewart)

Coins, pottery and spearheads have been found while auguring wells, mining coal and plowing fields throughout the midsection of the United States having Egyptian, Hebrew and Arabic designs. Some artifacts have insanely old dates of origin that challenge our current understanding concerning the existence of pre-Ice Age man on this continent.

One of the most amazing discoveries in the 20 th century is the Los Lunas Decalogue stone, which can be examined today if you are near Albuquerque , New Mexico . A version of the Ten Commandments was inscribed on it, in ancient Hebrew script (which is nearly identical to Phoenician script.) This 80-ton proof of the existence of Hebrew peoples in the area many centuries before the arrival of the Vikings and Columbus is not seriously disputed. The scripts are virtually identical to another artifact uncovered in Tell Dan, Israel in 1993, which dates to approximately 3000 years ago.

"The hieroglyphs on the tablets are similar to those used in King Solomon's time and include one identical to the symbol that always appeared on the ships he sent to the legendary land of Ophir, which the Bible described as the source of his gold, Savoy said" (San Francisco Chronicle, December 7, 1989).

The Celts have a story concerning the abundance of tin and silver mining in distant lands long before Christ. Tradition has it that the wealth of Joseph of Aramathea, Jesus' uncle, was obtained through tin trading with his fleet of ships of Phoenician design.

I need to digress here for a moment to make an important point. Most of mainstream Christianity cannot grab hold of the fact that the Hebrew people were scattered all over the world long, long ago, and were great in number. They were not – and are not – racially connected with the Jews we know of today (which are Jews by conversion, not by genetics.) They were the ancestors of today's Ango/Saxon, Scandinavian, German and kindred people; the Aryans. "Aryan" is a Sumerian word which described the serpent-worshipping, fair-haired, fair-skinned people from which civilization emerged at the dawn of the Bronze Age.

Abraham was from Ur – a uncovered Sumerian city full of Sumerian temples. "Aryan" is not an evil word originating in Nazi Germany. Though not all of these Adamic people trace their lineage to Shem, they are generally called "Semite" and are to be credited as the ruling, civilization peoples of Egypt, Babylonia, Iberia (Spain) and the near East. They were the people of Yahweh, and they were known by their God. It was from these people that the Minoan and Myan legends of the White God came. The name of the gods of the tribal peoples is not found on the Los Lunas stone. Instead, found on it is the Transgrammaton: Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Throughout the eastern coast of this land we find dolmens and tombs which are identical to those in England , Ireland and Scotland . Stone structures oriented for observing the solstices are eerily similar to those found in Celtic lands. It should not amaze us, then, that – according to Sir Walter Raleigh's History of the World – that the Indians he encountered used many Welsh words. Did you know that the Welsh language is closely to ancient Hebrew, and that one speaking in ancient Hebrew can communicate effectively with one speaking in Welsh?

There are so many more evidences that can be offered, but I want to paint a picture in your mind of an ancient America which is very different from the mainstream picture. As always – don't believe me, take the time to search these evidences out for yourself. Honestly consider the implications.

Our land stands as evidence that our God is true to His Word; that His people were to be great in number, and a blessing to the earth. As our land gives up its secrets, we do not find that scattered groups of dissimilar peoples were indigenous to it. Instead, we find that our forefathers were here long before, and bore their influence on the tribes found here in the 15 th century.